> Do you have any plan for evaluation and agreement ? If we have a lazy consensus here, I can open a JIRA ticket for moving this forward.
> 1. How do we migrate existing jiras ? IIRC the INFRA team has an SOP for this. > 2. How to write the release note ? A CHANGELOG.md ? Yes. That's possible. But GitHub's CHANGELOG is mainly based on PR while our JIRA release notes are based on tickets. As long as the PRs map to issues, it can be a viable workaround. > 3. Should we redirect github issues to the mailing list ? This is a MUST while IIRC we have commits@ to handle this activities. See [1][2]. [1] https://github.com/apache/curator/blob/eeee4c63be6e2377ab9fa8a70f9406dc410ee7d2/.asf.yaml#L40-L43 [2] https://github.com/apache/opendal/blob/d001321b0f9834bc1e2e7d463bcfdc3683e968c9/.asf.yaml#L42-L46 Best, tison. Kezhu Wang <kez...@gmail.com> 于2024年8月10日周六 00:20写道： > > Hi tison, > > +1 from my side. > > I am positive about github issues over jira. > 1. No more account registration approvals. It increases the bar for > newcomers. Also, it is hard for us to be capable of spam detectors > while not hurting the passions of newcomers. > 2. One account and permission systems. JIRA requires contributor > permission to get assigned by default. > 3. Github is much much more prevalent in the open source world. > > I do believe that JIRA is powerful, but I think it imposes a pretty > high contribution bar for Apache Curator. > > Do you have any plan for evaluation and agreement ? > > 1. How do we migrate existing jiras ? > 2. How to write the release note ? A CHANGELOG.md ? > 3. Should we redirect github issues to the mailing list ? > > > Best, > Kezhu Wang > > On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 4:53 PM tison <wander4...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I noticed that we don't commit anything in the past two months. > > However, the JIRA issue tracker should still have quite a few open > > issues. > > > > Perhaps moving those issues to GitHub issues can make it easy to track > > and handle. We don't heavily use JIRA anyway. The release note can be > > generated with GitHub also. > > > > This is my personal preference, but I can see potential developers may > > prefer an integrated solution on GitHub also. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Best, > > tison.
