I'm biased but I wouldn't follow ZK. It's based on what Hadoop was doing way back when and not current best practice. I'd take what you're currently doing (structure that's best for your project) and make sure you follow the release criteria from the docs. See the checklist on the release page for the main items.
Patrick On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]>wrote: > On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > This isn't how I see other Apache projects. I just downloaded the > > ZooKeeper source and the packaging is just ZooKeeper. > > > > For Curator, the group Id is apache and the project in the pom is Apache > > Curator. That should be enough, right? > > > > -JZ > > > > On Mar 29, 2013, at 4:42 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > - the project is not curator, it's Apache Curator, so we usually prefix > > > apache on the distro > > > > > I particularly don't think that Zookeeper packaging structure is one of the > best, but if you want to follow that particularly due to proximity of the > two projects, I'm ok with it. But note that they do produce a lib with the > binaries and dependencies. > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >
