[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-42?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13693483#comment-13693483
]
Jordan Zimmerman edited comment on CURATOR-42 at 6/25/13 11:18 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you mean calling delete on a non-existent node shouldn't fail? I disagree.
Curator does not try to change the semantics of ZooKeeper. A feature like this
should only be added with a modifier of some time, i.e.
delete().ignoringMissingNodes().forPath(...)
was (Author: randgalt):
Do you that calling delete on a non-existent node shouldn't fail? I
disagree. Curator does not try to change the semantics of ZooKeeper. A feature
like this should only be added with a modifier of some time, i.e.
delete().ignoringMissingNodes().forPath(...)
> DeleteBuilder considers NoNode to be a failed delete
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CURATOR-42
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-42
> Project: Apache Curator
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Shevek
> Assignee: Jordan Zimmerman
>
> In delete(), NoNode should be a special case which succeeds instantly, and
> does not consider the delete failed.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
