Great. 100 files to edit a second time.

I have a bigger maven problem to ask you about in my next message.

On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just FYI:
> -SNAPSHOT should be the LAST part of the version.  Otherwise, Maven doesn't
> think it's a snapshot.
>
> Dan
>
>
> On Tuesday 28 October 2008 8:45:03 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Author: bimargulies
>> Date: Tue Oct 28 17:45:03 2008
>> New Revision: 708747
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=708747&view=rev
>> Log:
>> pick a distinctive version tag.
>>
>> Modified:
>>     cxf/sandbox/benson/xmlschema/cxf/parent/pom.xml
>>
>> Modified: cxf/sandbox/benson/xmlschema/cxf/parent/pom.xml
>> URL:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cxf/sandbox/benson/xmlschema/cxf/parent/pom.xm
>>l?rev=708747&r1=708746&r2=708747&view=diff
>> ===========================================================================
>>=== --- cxf/sandbox/benson/xmlschema/cxf/parent/pom.xml (original)
>> +++ cxf/sandbox/benson/xmlschema/cxf/parent/pom.xml Tue Oct 28 17:45:03
>> 2008 @@ -20,13 +20,13 @@
>>      <parent>
>>          <groupId>org.apache.cxf</groupId>
>>          <artifactId>cxf</artifactId>
>> -        <version>2.2-SNAPSHOT</version>
>> +        <version>2.2-SNAPSHOT-xmlschema-2.0</version>
>>      </parent>
>>
>>      <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
>>      <groupId>org.apache.cxf</groupId>
>>      <artifactId>cxf-parent</artifactId>
>> -    <version>2.2-SNAPSHOT</version>
>> +    <version>2.2-SNAPSHOT-xmlschema-2.0</version>
>>      <name>Apache CXF Parent</name>
>>      <url>http://cxf.apache.org</url>
>>
>> @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@
>>              <dependency>
>>                  <groupId>org.apache.ws.commons.schema</groupId>
>>                  <artifactId>XmlSchema</artifactId>
>> -                <version>1.4.2</version>
>> +                <version>SNAPSHOT-possible-2.0</version>
>>              </dependency>
>>              <dependency>
>>                  <groupId>javax.xml.soap</groupId>
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://dankulp.com/blog
>

Reply via email to