I don't know much about this, but this email seems better routed to the Felix project--first get them to incorporate your work, and then come back to us. Or would you like our support in getting the Felix project to accept your code donation?
Glen David Bosschaert wrote: > > Hi all, > > In the context of the Apache CXF project a number of people have been > involved in implementing the Distribution Software part of Distributed > OSGi (RFC 119 [1]). > > For its functioning on the client side, Distributed OSGi depends on > the OSGi Service Registry Hooks (RFC 126, also available in [1]). To > keep us going we implemented certain bits of RFC 126 in a private copy > of Felix in the CXF DOSGi buildsystem. However, we would like to use > the real Felix, so we are interested in contributing our RFC 126 bits > into Felix so we can use it straight from there. This is referenced in > CXF bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1897 > > The CXF codebase doesnt contain all of RFC 126 - it only contains the > ListenerHook, which is about a third of RFC 126, but it would provide > a start... > > If Felix is interested in taking this implementation, it might make > sense to create a bug in Felix JIRA so that this stuff can be attached > as a patch to that once its ready to move into Felix. > > Thoughts anyone? > > Best regards, > > David > > [1] http://www.osgi.org/download/osgi-4.2-early-draft.pdf > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Contributing-parts-of-the-ServiceRegistry-Hooks-%28RFC-126%29-implementation-into-Felix-tp20325861p20327352.html Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
