Okay, thanks. No particular opinion about the WSDL pruning proposal then?
Andrew. Andi Abes wrote: > > The soapAction is the logical name of the operation - so CXF is very > correct in not touching it. > A good practice is not to use hostnames for it, but rather URI's that > represent the logical purpose of the operation. > > The soap:address is obviously used to connect to the service, hence it > must be updated. > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Andrew Clegg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 6:56 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Proposal -- removing irrelevent services from WSDL >> >> >> Hey folks, >> >> I have a WSDL-first project which contains several service > definitions, >> each >> with a separate binding to a separate port type. >> >> When I go to the 'services' page for the WAR in Tomcat, I get a bunch > of >> links like: >> >> http://myserver:8080/MyWar/services/ServiceOne?wsdl >> >> http://myserver:8080/MyWar/services/ServiceTwo?wsdl >> >> etc. >> >> Exactly the same WSDL, but published to different URLs. >> >> What would be really neat is if CXF could trim out the unused > services, >> bindings and port type definitions when it publishes the WSDL. >> >> I know it already does some editing as the soap:address location >> attributes >> are correct. Would the maintainers be interested in a patch to do this > if >> I >> volunteered? I *think* Axis2 does this, if I remember correctly, so > there >> might be some usable code in there. >> >> Interestingly, I just noticed the soap:operation soapAction attributes > are >> not updated the same way as soap:address is. They still have the > localhost >> test URLs which I hardcoded into my WSDL. Is this intentional, or a > bug, >> or >> a sign I've misconfigured something? (Does anything even use this?) >> >> Andrew. >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Proposal----removing- >> irrelevent-services-from-WSDL-tp20359717p20359717.html >> Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Proposal----removing-irrelevent-services-from-WSDL-tp20359717p20376006.html Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
