Hi Eoghan, How about set it to be 60s? I think we take the http client timeout(60s) as an example.
Cheers, Willem Eoghan Glynn wrote: > > Folks, > > Is a default value of 2000ms reasonable for the JMS clientReceiveTimeout? > > For even moderately long-lived requests, this seems *way* too tight to me. > > A timeout in the ballpark of 2s seems more appropriate for localhost > demo-type situation where you want the user to get rapid feedback if they've > set things up wrong, or for tests where again you want things to fail fast. > But if that's the motivation, couldn't the demos/tests just configure an > appropriately tight timeout, but leave much more slack in the default? > > Cheers, > Eoghan >
