2009/4/10 Eoghan Glynn <[email protected]>: > 2009/4/10 Sergey Beryozkin <[email protected]>: >> Would it still make sense to keep the Local Discovery service implementation >> ? For ex to test against multiple Discovery instances ? > > I think we definitely need to keep the local discovery service intact > in order to support the static remote-services.xml style of > configuration. > > Cheers, > Eoghan >
Yeah - I was planning to leave the local discovery bundle in there for that reason. So you can use the remote-services.xml static configuration alongside... Multible Discovery instances should work fine, but I agree Sergey that this would introduce a nice test case for it :) David
