In fact, I can probably update JSON provider to do it. If it is set to
operate in 'unwrapped' mode then it will append a class name to the stream,
will do it shortly
cheers, Sergey
Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I'm not sure yet - it appears JSONProvider may need to be updated to
> handle unwrapped cases.
> Does anyone know, is it already possible to do somehow in CXF ?
>
> Perhaps one workaround is to register a RequestFilter which will replace
> an InputStream on the inbound message with another stream which will
> present
>
> {"name":"abc"}
>
> as
>
> {"employee":{"name":"abc"}}
>
> for small streams (JSON ones are probably all quite small) this should
> work quite well. what do you think ?
>
> cheers, Sergey
>
>
>
> Chaitanya-10 wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a JAX-RS method which takes an Employee object as a param.
>> Employee class is given below.
>>
>> @XmlRootElement
>> public class Employee {
>> private String name;
>>
>> public String getName() {
>> return name;
>> }
>>
>> public void setName(String name) {
>> this.name = name;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> Unmarshalling of the JSON
>>
>> {"employee":{"name":"abc"}}
>>
>> works fine and gives an Employee object, but if the JSON input is
>>
>> {"name":"abc"}
>>
>> unmarshalling fails.
>>
>> Does CXF support both wrapped and unwrapped styles in Mapped convention
>> for JSON?
>> If yes what should be done to make the second case work?
>>
>> Thank you
>> Chaithanya.
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Supprot-for-wrapped-unwrapped-styles-in-Mapped-convention-for-JSON-tp24319534p24353228.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
