On Thu October 1 2009 4:48:55 am Christian Schneider wrote: > Hi Dan, > > for CXF-2275 there is currently no way to include the wsdl in the jar of > the current project. I think this should be added as you explained that > in some cases the wsdl is necessary at runtime.
I'm not so sure this is really necessary. I think the best option would be for them at runtime to specify the location of the "live" wsdl when creating the Service object. Like 'http://blah.com/services/foo?wsdl"; or similar. Thus, the wsdl wouldn't need to be added to the jar, but could also be used. > Do you know how to add a file to the jar? Is it just done by copying the > wsdl file to the classes folder? They would probably need to use the dependency:copy-artifact goal or similar to copy the wsdl artifact to something like target/generated-resources or something that is configured as a resources directory. > I also have to still add a test for the feature. Trygve advised to use > maven project with two subprojects for the test. One that creates the > wsdl and one that includes it and builds code from it. > I plan to add this to the systests. Ick.. Have fun. :-) I really hate trying to write tests for maven plugins. I'm not sure, but you MAY be able to look at the unit test frameworks for the remote-resources plugin. It supposedly uses the maven invoker stuff to invoke maven internally. Not really sure though. > CXF-2276 is finished. > Apart from this I think the additions should at least do no harm so it > is good to merge them to 2.2.x. Merged. Thanks! > I also would vote to include the new sample to 2.2.x. The one feature > that the new example does not show anymore is how to turn on xsd > validation. But I think this feature > is not so important - especially for beginners. Also merged. Thanks! Dan > > Greetings > > Christian > > Daniel Kulp schrieb: > > Christian, > > > > I've gone ahead and merged the changes for CXF-2275 and CXF-2276 onto > > 2.2.x since the changes are completely additive (shouldn't break > > anything) and I don't expect 2.3 to be ready for a little while (I know I > > don't have time to finish the stuff I was working on right now). These > > are great new things with little impact so getting them out is good, IMO. > > > > Are those JIRA's now "resolvable" or is there more work required? > > Mostly just curious. > > > > I'm also interested in hearing peoples thoughts about merging the new > > wsdl_first sample to 2.2.x. I know it will be a bit more work for me > > (Progress has some internal tests that test some of the samples to make > > sure they don't break and these changes will break those tests. Not a > > big deal.), but I have to make those changes for trunk testing anyway so > > not a big deal. > > > > The new sample really is MUCH nicer than the old one. I think getting > > it out there is probably a good thing. Thoughts? > -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] http://www.dankulp.com/blog
