> > Hi Łukasz, just in case you're not aware (highly unlikely), the link above
is now recommending the regular RFC 5849: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5849 instead of the draft link. Yes I noticed this new recommendations some time ago and I am using it now. Thanks for letting know. Cheers, Lukasz 2010/6/19 Glen Mazza <[email protected]>: > > > Łukasz Moreń wrote: >> >> I would like start coding OAuth support finally and I have some questions >> regarding that: >> >> 1. We agreed to use OAuth 1.0 spec, I assume to use: >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hammer-oauth-10 >> as is suggested in: http://oauth.net/core/1.0a/. WDYT? >> > > Hi Łukasz, just in case you're not aware (highly unlikely), the link above > is now recommending the regular RFC 5849: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5849 instead of the draft link. > > Regards, > Glen > > -- > View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/-GSoC--OAUTH--OAuth-implementation-kick-off-tp28753099p28936673.html > Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
