The one that doesn't pass the TCK? ;-) Jeff
On Jul 14, 2010, at 11:56 AM, Glen Mazza wrote: > > Team, I recently noticed a problem perhaps related to Tom's[1] regarding the > schemaLocation value in a JAXB binding file[2]. CXF enumerates schemas > using Schema Component Descriptors (SCD's) within a WSDL differently from > Metro, resulting in JAXB binding files being incompatible between the two: > > mybindingfile.xjb: > <!--CXF --> > <jaxb:bindings schemaLocation="ShoppingService.wsdl#types1" > node="/xs:schema"> > <!--Metro --> > <jaxb:bindings schemaLocation="ShoppingService.wsdl#types?schema1" > node="/xs:schema"> > > Where 1,2,3 in both cases refers to the 1-based count of the xsd:schema > within the single wsdl:type. The XJC compiler during the wsdl2java > generation process will reject the former for Metro and the latter for CXF. > > I'd like this to be standardized so the binding files would be portable > between the two frameworks but I'm not sure which framework is correct. The > CXF method of incrementing the number next to the types seems inaccurate > because there can be only one wsdl:types. On the other hand, Metro's usage > of the ? as a delimiter does not appear to be defined in the SCD candidate > recommendation (http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-ref/#section-scd-syntax). > > Granted, the CXF dev list might not be the most unbiased of forums, but any > idea which team is "wrong"? > > Thanks, > Glen > > [1] > http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Invalid-WSDL-with-a-Jax-ws-schemaLocation-XSD-specified-td1046395.html#a1046395 > [2] > http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/entry/customizing_jaxb_artifacts#BindingFile > [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-ref/#section-scd-syntax > -- > View this message in context: > http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Metro-vs-CXF-difference-in-enumerating-schemas-within-a-WSDL-tp1092957p1092957.html > Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
