Sergey Beryozkin-5 wrote: > > Don't really get it... Or is it the case of someone missing the point that > some users of CXF just do not want to use Spring ? >
I don't know, I just think it would be nice if there was a separate Apache Banana project that consists of Spring but with its JARs renamed and packages renamed from org.springframework.* to org.bananaframework.*. That way our code would be based on an established framework that's easy for developers to understand while at the same time truthfully allowing us to say that there's no Spring in our source code. Keeps the developers happy, keeps the pointy-haired bosses happy. What do you do at work if you're using Spring's InitializingBean but your boss says not to use Spring? OK, Spring's Apache licensed, so you take the class, rename it to org.whatever.InitializingBean, and copy it in your code (keeping the copyright header, of course) and you're done. Apache Banana would serve as a one-stop formalization of that effort that all developers can quickly use. Glen -- View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/JMS-transport-strongly-depends-on-Spring-tp2262704p2264656.html Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
