Hi here are few more suggestions :
- Talk to Dejan about Jettison 1.2.1 - there was a patch submitted there by the CXF user - CXF-2997 (multiple CXFServlets serving a single service bean) seems like a real blocker - I'll try to look into it asap - Eliminate the dependency on wss4j from the jaxrs frontend - See if either of GSOC projects can make it from the sandbox, log browser can make a rt-management-web a more attractive module for users to play with. I'll also talk to Lucasz... cheers, Sergey On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: > > We've now challenged the last few remaining JAX-RS 1.1 tests. We're > waiting > to see if the challenge is accepted or not (and it's going to be slow due > to > JavaOne), but that pretty much means we're really close to having JAX-RS > 1.1 > stuff ready. JAX-WS 2.2 stuff is already completely passing. Thus, I > think > we're getting really close to having 2.3 ready to release. I'd like to > collect of list of things that still need to be done (and hopefully get > them > into JIRA): > > 1) Finish docs of new annotations (my plate) > > 2) Update docs around the new continuations behavior. Mostly in the > migration > guide to mention how the new behavior may require some code changes. > (willem, > can you pick that up) > > 3) (optional) Update the jms sample to use jms spec. (benson, not high > priority though) Acutally, would be good to update the other jms samples > as > well. > > 4) (optional) Try and get new releases of WSS4J and XmlSchema. WSS4J would > be > nice as it would allow fixing a couple other JIRA issues. I'll talk to > Colm > about WSS4J. > > 5) Packaging issues with cxf-bundle. I'll start a separate thread for > this, > but the quick summary is there are things that aren't in cxf-bundle (like > sdo > databinding, and some of the validation jars and such). There are also > things that are in the bundle that probably could not be (like all the > tools > could go into a separate cxf-tools bundle to reduce the size of the rt > bundle). Anyway, separate thread. > > 6) JIRA issues - like normal, I plan to go through JIRA and see if there > are > any "easy fixes" that can be done quickly or have patches that could be > reviewed. > > > Anything else? > > Looking at it, would people feel OK trying to target the week of Oct 4th as > the release for 2.3? The packaging issues are the main thing that need > to > be finalized. Hopefully not too major. > > Thoughts? > > -- > Daniel Kulp > [email protected] > http://dankulp.com/blog >
