Not this particular test. I can't even figure out why the test has this in the schema. I gave the element a name.
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday 12 October 2010 5:49:31 pm Benson Margulies wrote: >> One of our test schemas says: >> >> >> <element name="inHeader"> >> <complexType> >> <sequence> >> <element name="" >> type="xsd:string"/> >> </sequence> >> </complexType> >> </element> >> >> >> Is a null name really a reasonable thing in a sequence? As I read the >> spec, name="" is never reasonable. The spec demands an NCName for >> name, and either name or ref must be present. > > Yea. I don't think that would be valid. Now, the question is, is the test > testing what happens with an invalid schema? I suppose that's too much to > ask for. :-) > > -- > Daniel Kulp > [email protected] > http://dankulp.com/blog >
