Hi Dan,
Yeah, JDK ships the CORBA implementation.
But if the customer doesn't want to the JDK's one and use other ORB
implementation, these imports mandatory will cause some trouble and
customer had to modify the etc/jre.properties of karaf himself.
Willem
On 1/24/11 11:05 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Willem,
I'm just curious (this isn't a veto or anything), why was this needed?
org.omg classes are built into the JDK and thus SHOULD be available in every
OSGi runtime since it's built into the JDK. Basically, since it's JDK
provided, it would always be resolved anyway and thus available.
Anyway, I'm just curious. :-)
Dan
On Monday 24 January 2011 9:02:15 am [email protected] wrote:
Author: ningjiang
Date: Mon Jan 24 14:02:15 2011
New Revision: 1062778
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1062778&view=rev
Log:
CXF-3279 Marking the imports of the CORABA package to be optional
Modified:
cxf/trunk/distribution/bundle/all/pom.xml
Modified: cxf/trunk/distribution/bundle/all/pom.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cxf/trunk/distribution/bundle/all/pom.xml?rev
=1062778&r1=1062777&r2=1062778&view=diff
==========================================================================
==== --- cxf/trunk/distribution/bundle/all/pom.xml (original)
+++ cxf/trunk/distribution/bundle/all/pom.xml Mon Jan 24 14:02:15 2011
@@ -332,6 +332,7 @@
org.junit*;resolution:=optional,
org.mozilla.javascript*;resolution:=optional,
org.objectweb.asm*;version="[2.0,4)",
+ org.omg*;resolution:=optional,
org.slf4j*;resolution:=optional;version="[1.5,2)",
org.springframework*;resolution:=optional;version="[2.5,4)",
javax.activation;version="[0.0,2)",
--
Willem
----------------------------------
FuseSource
Web: http://www.fusesource.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
http://jnn.javaeye.com (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
