Hmm... The XML looks fine. Sounds like your picking up a bad XML/StAX
parser and not woodstox.
You MAY be able to work around it via:
<http:conduit
xmlns:http="http://cxf.apache.org/transports/http/configuration";
name="*.http-conduit">
<http:client
xmlns:http="http://cxf.apache.org/transports/http/configuration";
AutoRedirect="true" Connection="Keep-Alive"
ConnectionTimeout="6000" ReceiveTimeout="6000" CacheControl="no-cache"
AllowChunking="false" />
</http:conduit>
Basically adding some redundant namespace decls. That may work. Not really
sure though.
Dan
On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 6:17:31 AM matiou wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Thank you for your fast reply.
>
> Daniel Kulp wrote
>
> > The error makes it sound like there is an XML issue. Can you post the
> > xml
> > configuration ?
>
> Here is the xml configuration file, which is pretty light (and works in
> 2.1.4) :
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans";
> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
> xmlns:sec="http://cxf.apache.org/configuration/security";
> xmlns:http="http://cxf.apache.org/transports/http/configuration";
> xmlns:jaxws="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jaxws";
> xmlns:wsa="http://cxf.apache.org/ws/addressing";
> xmlns:cxf="http://cxf.apache.org/core";
>
> xsi:schemaLocation="http://cxf.apache.org/core
> http://cxf.apache.org/schemas/core.xsd
>
> http://cxf.apache.org/configuration/security
>
http://cxf.apache.org/schemas/configuration/security.xsd
>
http://cxf.apache.org/transports/http/configuration
>
> http://cxf.apache.org/schemas/configuration/http-
conf.xsd
>
> http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
>
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.0.xsd";>
>
>
> <http:conduit name="*.http-conduit">
> <http:client AutoRedirect="true" Connection="Keep-Alive"
> ConnectionTimeout="6000" ReceiveTimeout="6000" CacheControl="no-cache"
> AllowChunking="false" />
> </http:conduit>
> </beans>
>
>
> Daniel Kulp wrote
>
> > You can also try adding the namespaces needed to the http-conduit
> > element. That MAY help.
>
> What's the namespaces you are talking about ? I don't see any mention of
> namespace needed in the stackstrace.
>
>
> Daniel Kulp wrote
>
> > It almost sounds like you aren't picking up woodstox, but I'm not really
> > sure. 2.1.9 was still long enough ago that I'm not sure what the state
> > of
> > everything was. I'd definitely suggest up
> > dating to 2.5.0 if possible and trying to see if that fixes things.
>
> OK, I'll try it, hoping there will not be migration problem
>
> Thanks, matiou
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Upgrading-from-2-1-4-to-2-1-9-tp5009968p501
> 6781.html Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Daniel Kulp
[email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
