Hi Johan, Dan,

I just added the HTTPConduit part in trunk. Not everything is in yet, though.

regards, aki

2012/2/7 Aki Yoshida <[email protected]>:
> 2012/2/7 Johan Edstrom <[email protected]>:
>> Heh :)
>>
>> Not 100% sure we said the same thing here.
>> I'm gone for about the next 4 days, I might start if, if you want to, please 
>> go ahead.
>> The customer I was out with that put the ticket in was basically looking for 
>> jetty + ssl config.
>
> Hi Johan,
> I was confused with your remark but saw a lot of energy coming out of
> it. And I thought you would be finishing it up by the weekend. I, on
> the other hand, was thinking about working on it so that it can make
> into 2.5.3 sometime.
>
> I will look into the http client side and get back to you.
>
> Regards, aki
>
>>
>> The client side stuff would not necessarily have to interfere with that, the 
>> osgi servlet, now that is
>> a potential different discussion, what is the right handling of SSL on that 
>> side?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Feb 6, 2012, at 4:55 PM, Aki Yoshida wrote:
>>
>>> 2012/2/6 Johan Edstrom <[email protected]>:
>>>> I got about as far as looking at the http:jetty schemas and was hoping I'd 
>>>> be able to
>>>> consolidate some of the parts there.
>>>>
>>>> I'm currently on the road 3h + on EST, so I think I might be fighting jet 
>>>> lag for a day or so.
>>>> I'll be available for testing and some banging on it at the very least 
>>>> friday eve til monday morn,
>>>> I suspect in-between as well.
>>>
>>> Okay. I will leave it to you then.  I just noticed that the actual
>>> http-conf schema definition does not have spring dependency (i.e., not
>>> using beans:identifierTypes etc). So, we don't need to modify the
>>> schema and my earlier comment is invalid.  I was looking at the wrong
>>> http-conf.xsd earlier and had the wrong assumption.
>>>
>>>> to be quite honest I got hijacked in the client changes Dan did for the 
>>>> http transport,
>>>> I kinda like those global conduits, but I'm thinking people might want a 
>>>> very spring similar
>>>> approach in http and httpj:?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I haven't followed up on that change. I think the locally encapsulated
>>> configuration is practical in some uses cases. In contrast, the
>>> central configuration thing is a very useful thing when considering
>>> the management of the sensitive information. In that direction, I
>>> thought that we could also eventually use the apache HTTPClient (if we
>>> could use it for the http conduit) and refer to it from the conduit?
>>> In that case, we could reuse the http configurations in other
>>> components. Dan once talked about using the apache http client. I
>>> wanted to look into the current status of this work.
>>>
>>> regards aki
>>>
>>>
>>>> /je
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 6, 2012, at 9:59 AM, Aki Yoshida wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Johan,
>>>>>
>>>>> Dan mentioned that you might have started working on this item. Please
>>>>> let me know whether I can help here.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards, aki
>>>>>
>>>>> 2012/2/6 Daniel Kulp <[email protected]>:
>>>>>> On Monday, February 06, 2012 1:16:20 PM Aki Yoshida wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Dan,
>>>>>>> I can look into this item using a similar approach used in ws-rm using
>>>>>>> the merged schemas.
>>>>>>> Let me know if you see some issues.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just make sure you work with Johan Edstrom.   I think he may have started
>>>>>> looking into this a bit and I don't want to cause him any wasted time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks.
>>>>>>> regards, aki
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2012/2/3 Tony Su (Created) (JIRA) <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>> Blueprint http
>>>>>>>> --------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 Key: CXF-4084
>>>>>>>>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4084
>>>>>>>>             Project: CXF
>>>>>>>>          Issue Type: New Feature
>>>>>>>>          Components: Transports
>>>>>>>>    Affects Versions: 2.5
>>>>>>>>            Reporter: Tony Su
>>>>>>>>            Priority: Minor
>>>>>>>>             Fix For: 2.5.3, 2.6
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Some initial support for blueprint was provided in 2.4, but there are
>>>>>>>> still additional schemas that need porting.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Add support for http transport blueprint namespace handlers, parser and
>>>>>>>> typeconverters
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>>>>>>>> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
>>>>>>>> administrators:
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
>>>>>>>> For more information on JIRA, see: 
>>>>>>>> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>>>> [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>>
>>

Reply via email to