Willem, Not objecting to this, but wondering why it's necessary? Such conduits really should be configured based on URL, not some strange internal name or similar. Seriously, a conduit thing like:
<http:conduit name="http.*"> ... would likely accomplish the exact same thing. Dan On Friday, March 23, 2012 04:01:19 AM [email protected] wrote: > Author: ningjiang > Date: Fri Mar 23 04:01:19 2012 > New Revision: 1304181 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1304181&view=rev > Log: > CXF-4195 fixed the configuration issue of http conduit for WsdlUrl > > Modified: > > cxf/trunk/api/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/transport/TransportURIResolver > .java > > Modified: > cxf/trunk/api/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/transport/TransportURIResolver > .java URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cxf/trunk/api/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/t > ransport/TransportURIResolver.java?rev=1304181&r1=1304180&r2=1304181&view= > diff > ========================================================================= > ===== --- > cxf/trunk/api/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/transport/TransportURIResolver > .java (original) +++ > cxf/trunk/api/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/transport/TransportURIResolver > .java Fri Mar 23 04:01:19 2012 @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ import > java.net.URISyntaxException; > import java.util.HashSet; > import java.util.Set; > > +import javax.xml.namespace.QName; > + > import org.xml.sax.InputSource; > > import org.apache.cxf.Bus; > @@ -101,6 +103,8 @@ public class TransportURIResolver extend > } > if (ci != null) { > EndpointInfo info = new EndpointInfo(); > + // set the endpointInfo name which could be used for > configuration + info.setName(new > QName("http://cxf.apache.org";, "TransportURIResolver")); > info.setAddress(base.toString()); > final Conduit c = ci.getConduit(info); > Message message = new MessageImpl(); -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
