On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Glen Mazza <[email protected]> wrote: > Really? AFAICT the code I linked to *is* using Tomcat, if perhaps not > directly in the manner that you're interested. > Glen
Really. Currently, when you just 'launch an endpoint', CXF launches Jetty behind your back. I'd love to make it possible for CXF to do the same with Tomcat; however, your scheme gets me the same end-user benefits for a lot less effort than building a http_tomcat transport next to the http_jetty transport. > > > Benson Margulies wrote >> >> Glen, >> >> This is very helpful if I want to cheap out of actually teaching CXF >> to embed tomcat as it currently embeds Jetty:-) >> >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Glen Mazza <glen.mazza@> wrote: >>> >>> Benson Margulies wrote >>>> >>>> Last year, I took a look at tomcat as an alternative to Jetty for >>>> embedding purposes. >>>> >>>> I ran aground, I was just too ignorant. >>>> >>>> Since I seem, again, to be hitting jetty bugs that close 'idle' >>>> connections inappropriately, I've got myself interested again. >>>> >>>> Is anyone who has a grip on server transports willing to help me out? >>>> >>> >>> I had done an example with embedded Tomcat a while back, perhaps it might >>> help you: >>> http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/entry/junit_web_service_testing#testtc >>> >>> Glen >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Tomcat-embedding-tp5659578p5660035.html >>> Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Tomcat-embedding-tp5659578p5660755.html > Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
