There doesn't seem to be any objection to this so I'll go ahead and send a 
quick note to the users list to let them know.

Dan


On Tuesday, April 24, 2012 02:30:42 PM Daniel Kulp wrote:
> Just wanted to open up a discussion about dropping support for 2.3.x.
> 2.3.0 was release over 18 months ago.  Since then, 2.4.x was released over
> a year ago and 2.5.x  6 months ago. (and 2.6 last week).   Thus, there
> has been plenty of opportunity (a whole year) for people to upgrade to
> newer versions.
> 
> Right now, we have 4 branches we're supporting (2.6(trunk)/2.5/2.4/2.3)
> and we're likely soon going to make a 2.6 branch and open up trunk for
> 2.7 work adding yet another one.  Dropping 2.3 will simplify things a bit
> for us.
> 
> The major "con" to it is that there are still a lot of folks using 2.3.x.
> According the Nexus stats of central, last month, 2.3.3 was still the
> second most downloaded version. (next to 2.5.2)   However, if they are on
> 2.3.3 which was released over a year ago, they haven't been grabbing the
> latest patches anyway so producing more patches won't really matter to
> them.
> 
> In any case, I'm think about doing one more 2.3.x release (2.3.11) which
> would be announced as the end of the 2.3.x line.    Obviously if any
> security issues pop up we can push another release in the future, but
> basically end the regular patch releases.
> 
> Any objections or other thoughts?
-- 
Daniel Kulp
[email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Reply via email to