I chose the proposed release date to sync with a release of our ESB product. Basically what they need is just the improved zookeeper starter with the cluster support. So I would prefer to do the release with what we have till then but it would not be too problematic to move the release.
Christian On 11/12/2012 12:44 PM, David Bosschaert wrote: > Hi Christian, > > Sounds great and I think the work you've done and the work you're > proposing to do is a great step forward. > > However, some of the features that you've planned are fairly large, > and I would wonder whether it's feasible to have them all added and > stable within 2 weeks. > Would it not be better to implement all of these first and then call > for the release when it's all ready? > > Alternatively, if, for some reason you are unable to finish all of the > work that you're planning to do, we could still do a release with the > features that made it and delay the other ones to an later release, > IMHO... > > Cheers, > > David > > On 12 November 2012 10:04, Christian Schneider <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> There are a lot of new features in the CXF DOSGi implementation. I would >> like to do a release of DOSGi in about two weeks. What do you think >> about it? >> Here are the done and planned features. >> >> Highlights: >> - Karaf Feature file for DOSGi >> - Reconnection support for Zookeeper discovery >> >> I am planning to do these additional features before the release: >> - Switch logging to slf4j-api >> - Use pax logging for all distributions >> - Support Zookeeper in Cluster mode >> - Remove Spring dependency (switch intention map support to OSGi service) >> >> Christian >> >> Here are the detailed issues: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DOSGI/fixforversion/12319877#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversion-issues-panel >> >>
