I will start the issue "Provide a default address for services " (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DOSGI-127) soon. The idea is to provide a default servlet transport based address in case no address service property is defined.
I found that currently we already provide a default address based on the jetty transport. The disadvantage is that this needs a host and port number that have to be configured either on the service or for the cxf dosgi dsw bundle. So two questions: 1) Is it ok to switch to the servlet transport as the new default? 2) How much backwards compatibility do we need? About 2) I found that we have default.host and default.port that were to be configured using the config admin service. When looking closer into the code I found that the code supporting this is not attached to the config admin service. So it looks like the default settings currently can not be configured at all. So only the hard coded defaults of "localhost" and "9090" work. For the service we have the Constants.WS_PORT_PROPERTY(org.apache.cxf.ws.port) that can be set in the service. So do we need to support these configs or can I simply remove the whole code concerning this when I switch to the servlet transport? If no backwards compatibility is needed then a lot of code could be removed. For example the code for determining the localhost address and the whole handlerProperties for the configTypeHandlers. Christian
