Hi Dan, For CXF 3, +1 to drop aries 0.3.x support +1 to drop spring 2.5.x support and use spring 3.2 by default but still support spring 3.1 and yeah, we better still support jetty 7.x in CXF 3
Thanks －－－－－－－－－－－－－ Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/ Twitter: freemanfang Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042 weibo: @Freeman小屋 www.camelone.org : The open source integration conference: On 2013-5-22, at 上午12:39, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > Curious what people think about the various versions for CXF 3. > > Aries: > We current support 1.x and 0.3.x via a bunch of reflection stuff. If we drop > support for 0.3.x, we can clean up some of that reflection code. However, we > then lose support for Karaf 2.2.x. > > Spring: > We current test with 3.1, but have some level of support for 2.5.x by calling > a bunch of deprecated methods instead of the newer methods. Thoughts about > at least dropping support for 2.5.x? Likely should move to 3.2 as our > default, but keep support for 3.1? > > Jetty: > We current test and ship 8.1, but have support for 7.x via a bunch of > reflection code. Since even Karaf 2.3 uses 7.x, we likely need to keep > this. :-( > > > > -- > Daniel Kulp > [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com >
