Sorry guys, same reasoning here.
If tck regressions (on 2.7.7) are enough for justifying a -1, here is mine.
Alessio
On 17/09/13 12:31, Jim Ma wrote:
I have to -1 this release if tck result is a matter. After the tck check,
there are some failures related to DispatchImpl. I am chasing these
failures.
Cheers,
Jim
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Andrei Shakirin <[email protected]>wrote:
+1 (non binding)
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Samstag, 14. September 2013 14:37
To: [email protected]
Subject: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10
We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.7.6 and almost 50 ported back to
2.6.10.
This also includes an update release of our build-utils to get the PMD
stuff
needed to work with the latest Eclipse.
List of issues:
2.6.10
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310511
&version=12324771
2.7.7
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310511
&version=12324770
The Maven staging areas are at:
build-utils:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-042/
2.6.10
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-041/
2.7.7
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-043/
The distributions are in the org/apache/cxf/apache-cxf/ directory of the
Maven staging areas.
This releases are tagged at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/build-utils/tags/cxf-build-utils-2.6.0/
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/tags/cxf-2.6.10
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/tags/cxf-2.7.7
This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
--
Daniel Kulp
[email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder -
http://coders.talend.com
--
Alessio Soldano
Web Service Lead, JBoss
