On Jan 22, 2014, at 9:35 AM, Alessio Soldano <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 22/01/14 15:30, Daniel Kulp wrote: >> Few thoughts though: >> >> 1) Lets wait until after at least milestone2. We’re close and I don’t want >> to screw any of that up. >> >> 2) I’d LIKE to rebuild the git repo and possibly remove all the /incubator >> revisions and tags. Kind of “start” at the graduation. Maybe a bit before >> at the 2.0-incubator release. Or at least all the “lib” dirs out of them. >> That would chop about 100MB out of the .git directory making it a LOT >> smaller. The original codebase kept .jar files in the repo which sucks >> with git. I’m really not sure how much of the history and tags from >> 2005/2006 is at all important anymore so this is likely not a big deal. >> Plus, the history is still in SVN if we really need it. > +1 on pruning the incubator stuff and the old libs. > > Who is going to process pull requests? you? (really just to know which > process is being adopted) Anyone who is a committer will be able to “push” changes into the canonical repo here at Apache. Honestly, for committers, you can use git just like you you git-svn or just svn today. Just instead of “git svn dcommit” or “svn commit” it would be a “git push”. If you don’t want your workflow to change, you don’t really need it to change. The commands are just a little different and many of the operations perform much faster. -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
