No, you should in theory be able to add Claims information via a
CallbackHandler (or DOM Element) to the STSClient, and they should be
included in the generated SAML Assertion....but looking at the code it
doesn't appear that the Validate binding actually sends the Claims Element.
I will fix this...

Colm.


On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Sergey Beryozkin <[email protected]>wrote:

> On 06/02/14 09:42, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
>
>> As far as I know, all of this functionality is already available. Take a
>> look at the TransformationTest here:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cxf/trunk/services/sts/
>> systests/advanced/src/test/java/org/apache/cxf/systest/
>> sts/transformation/TransformationTest.java?view=markup
>>
>> This uses the STSTokenValidator to transform a UsernameToken into a SAML
>> Assertion. Note the configuration of the service, you can just manually
>> configure an STSClient Object to send whatever Claims etc. you want:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cxf/trunk/services/sts/
>> systests/advanced/src/test/resources/org/apache/cxf/
>> systest/sts/transformation/cxf-service.xml?view=markup
>>
>
> As far as I understand this is not what Oli is asking about. The context
> is we have an RS endpoint, and the client using Basic Auth. Next we have an
> RS interceptor which transform this Basic Auth and uses STSTokenValidator
> to validate it with STS and get a SAML assertion back representing the
> authenticated user.
>
> This is documented here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF20DOC/
> Secure+JAX-RS+Services#SecureJAX-RSServices-ValidatingBasicAuthcredentials
> withSTS
>
> and the configuration of STSClient and STSTokenValidtor was probably
> copied from the configuration example you linked to above.
>
> My understanding is, the SAML assertion returned from STSTokenValidator
> has the limited information, example, it has no claims attached to it, etc.
>
> Oli, is it right ?
>
> So I think, fundamentally, this kind of the extra metadata such as the
> extra claims, etc, can only come from STS, not from the STSTokenValidator
> itself which is a mere link between WS/RS endpoints and STS.
>
> Oli, may be indeed we should optionally get STS issue the assertion given
> Basic Auth ? If not then I'd say the validation response should have the
> extra bits
>
> Thanks, Sergey
>
>
>
>
>> Colm.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Sergey Beryozkin <[email protected]
>> >wrote:
>>
>>  Hi Oli
>>>
>>> On 05/02/14 19:42, Oliver Wulff wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi there
>>>>
>>>> The STSTokenValidator is used to validate incoming credentials (ex.
>>>> username/password) against the STS. The STSTokenValidator can be used
>>>> for
>>>> authentication for web services as well a REST services.
>>>>
>>>> REST security is already very enhanced to support claims based access
>>>> control which requires that the service provider knows the user claims
>>>> like
>>>> from a SAML token. This could also be achieved for incoming
>>>> username/passwords by issuing a SAML token with a configurable list of
>>>> claims.
>>>>
>>>> The STSTokenValidator uses the STS validate binding which doesn't
>>>> support
>>>> to validate a token and provide additional claims in the returned SAML
>>>> token.
>>>>
>>>> There are two options:
>>>>
>>>> 1) Make the binding configurable in the STSTokenValidator
>>>> (validate/issue) and configure the list of claims, appliesto element,
>>>> lifetime etc. for the issue use case
>>>>
>>>> 2) Enhance the validate binding use case on the STS and in the
>>>> STSTokenValidator to configure the list of claims, appliesto element,
>>>> lifetime etc.
>>>>
>>>> WDYT?
>>>>
>>>>   It appears to me that STS is where the extra metadata like claims can
>>>> be
>>>>
>>> attached so I guess I'm more for the 2nd case, I looked at the code and
>>> apparently STSTokenValidator supports the case of STS transforming a
>>> token.
>>> Look forward to Colm commenting on it
>>>
>>> Thanks, Sergey
>>>
>>>
>>>   Thanks
>>>
>>>> Oli
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------
>>>>
>>>> Oliver Wulff
>>>>
>>>> Blog: http://owulff.blogspot.com<http://owulff.blogspot.com/>
>>>> Solution Architect
>>>> http://coders.talend.com
>>>>
>>>> <http://coders.talend.com>Talend Application Integration Division
>>>> http://www.talend.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Sergey Beryozkin
>
> Talend Community Coders
> http://coders.talend.com/
>
> Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com
>



-- 
Colm O hEigeartaigh

Talend Community Coder
http://coders.talend.com

Reply via email to