Sergey,
I haven't look at the details and I'm not an expert of CDI at all, but
my gut feeling is that any additional support of CDI injection directly
by CXF could possibly clash with similar features already available in
containers integrating CXF and targetting full JavaEE compliance. So, if
an additional CDI support is being added, it should probably be possible
to turn it off (though a configuration option, or such).
Just my 2cents
Alessio
On 10/02/14 13:23, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi Andrei
On 10/02/14 08:49, Andrei Shakirin wrote:
Hi Sergei,
Do you mean the full support of JSR-299 including stereotypes,
qualifiers, alternatives or just support of @Inject annotation for
some CXF security, message, context objects?
The first seems to be a bit involved, however the second sounds
reasonable for me.
Yes I agree, I think we should let the containers deal with most of
it, but limit it to supporting @Inject.
In fact, I'd probably consider supporting it initially at the level
shown at
https://github.com/abhijitsarkar/groovy/blob/master/movie-manager/movie-manager-web/src/main/groovy/name/abhijitsarkar/moviemanager/web/MovieResource.groovy
(The same will apply for JAX-WS).
The link above shows what JAX-RS 2.0 spec expects too from
CDI-compliant implementations. The spec also mentions that @Inject may
be supported for injecting JAX-RS annotated properties (example,
instead of @Context UriInfo -> @Inject UriInfo) but should warn about
the non-portability - I'd be OK with Tom EE supporting all of it
(meaning the injection of contexts too) for JAX-WS/JAX-RS, but I guess
it is up for the discussion.
I wonder, if some basic/straight-forward link can be supported in CXF
to support the injection of beans into service classes via @Inject so
that people can just add CDI RI dep and have it working ?
Thanks, Sergey
Regards,
Andrei.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sonntag, 9. Februar 2014 19:43
To: CXF Dev
Subject: Optional support for CDI integration ?
Hi All,
Does it make sense to offer some optional support for CDI directly
in CXF ? I
guess we can expect more and more queries about it going forward,
I'll want to investigate more about it in scope of the JAX-RS 2.0
spec work
anyway, but I wonder what can be done in CXF in general
Thanks, Sergey
--
Alessio Soldano
Web Service Lead, JBoss
