On Jun 19, 2014, at 8:55 AM, Sergey Beryozkin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Andriy > On 19/06/14 12:47, Andrey Redko wrote: >> Hi Sergey, >> >> Just some thoughts on that: if we have features for 3.1 already in >> work, it makes sense to introduce new branch for 3.1.x >> I might be wrong but it seems like 3.0.x is going to be a mainstream for >> a while and as such should stay a trunk. > > Well, I hope 3.0.1 will be released soon enough to address the issues already > found in 3.0.0, while releasing 3.1.0 can take its time, 3.1.0 can take more > of new changes (like more advanced Java 8 support Dan has talked about, etc) Yep. There’s a couple of snapshots that need to cycle through (Santuario, WSS4J) that once done, I plan on doing 3.0.1/2.7.12 and the final 2.6.x release. Then create the branch. Dan > > Thanks, Sergey > >> Thanks. >> >> Best Regards, >> Andriy Redko >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Sergey Beryozkin <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> Should we introduce 3.1.0 trunk and 3.0.x branch respectively ? >> May be we should wait till 2.6.x is closed first... >> >> Thanks, Sergey >> >> > -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
