> On Dec 4, 2014, at 12:09 PM, Jason Pell <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to change the existing behavior of JMS destination to NOT
> rollback the transaction if a checked exception is encountered.

Honestly, this is how I thought it DID work.   Checked exceptions are expected 
conditions and valid responses.

Dan



> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6136
> 
> Christian suggested I post an email to this list to give everyone an
> opportunity to agree or disagree with my proposed changes.
> 
> Currently if a transaction manager is registered (even just a JMS
> transaction manager) and an exception is thrown by an impl method the JMS
> message will be rolled back.
> 
> There is currently no distinction made. Even if I throw a business soap
> fault its still going to roll back the message.
> 
> I would like to add code to JMS Destination to no longer propagate checked
> exceptions which will result in the delivery of a soap fault response to
> the JMS reply queue.
> 
> Christian has suggested we could make this change without a backwards
> compatible config entry in JMSConfiguration. I am happy to add a config
> entry to maintain legacy behavior..
> 
> Thoughts?

-- 
Daniel Kulp
[email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Reply via email to