Are you dealing with some specific side-effects or would just like to
see less of TCCL in CXF ?
I agree with what Christian said - in some cases CXF needs it as it is
not an OSGI-only framework. But if minimizing the use of TCCL is
possible then I guess it is a good idea.
Sergey
On 24/02/15 09:44, Mike Wilson wrote:
We're using CXF in a Karaf/OSGi setting and have noticed that CXF makes use
of the contextClassLoader (TCCL), which is considered bad practice in OSGi.
Some discussion has taken place on the osgi-dev mailing list, see [1], and
Christian Schneider recommended to take this question to cxf-dev.
Would it be possible to disable, or decrease the scope of, TCCL usage in CXF
when run inside OSGi?
Looking at the source code I see CXF is already aware that it is running
inside OSGi through its Blueprint integration, so I'm thinking maybe this
would be possible to control through the extension mechanism?
Thanks
Mike Wilson
[1]
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg03643.html
