Hi Christian. Thank you again. You gave me good insights and ideas. In fact there is other researcher checking if there are relation between direct and "not direct" connections between classes and comparing then with code changes. We found that structural dependencies are not "good predictors" to code changes, but we are investigating more this situation.
In my case I did not consider structural dependencies because I use the contextual information collected from "each commit". So, in this case, probably this measure will be removed from my model because they will not add explanation to predict the changes. However, it is in my plan to consider this information as a "prior" indicator to boost my predictions. Thanks again about the rich discussion. -- View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Feedback-of-my-Phd-work-in-CXF-project-tp5763765p5763789.html Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
