On 14/12/2015 12:59, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
2015-12-14 12:45 GMT+01:00 Sergey Beryozkin <[email protected]>:
Hi Benson
On 11/12/15 16:19, Benson Margulies wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6706
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6705
The changes I've committed for CXF-6705 make it possible to use bean
validation, but ...
1: only with hibernate
2: only with extra code to obtain the validation provider.
This raises two questions.
1: should I restructure the features to split
'cxf-bean-validation-hibernate' from 'cxf-bean-validation', leaving
room for bval?
Please, I've heard Apache BVal is less complete, but I think we should
keep the option open for users who would like to experiment with this
Apache project
Hi guys, happy to help fixing any gap there if you need. BVal passes TCKs
so IMO it is a valid option.
Hi Romain,
AFAICT, current BVal release (2012!) passes the TCK for JSR-303 (e.g.
Bean Validation 1.0), not JSR-349 (e.g. Bean Validation 1.1)
http://bval.apache.org/downloads.html
Am I wrong?
Incidentally, this is the reason why we had to switch from BVal to
Hibernate Validator in Syncope, a couple of major releases ago.
Regards.
2: should I put the code in place that actually makes it work, and, if
so, where? I think it would be an additional bundle under 'osgi' that
provided a BeanValidationProviderFactory or a
ValidationProviderHelper.
I guess the servicemix API spec bundle should help.
Hi JB, do you think a new BVal spec bundle may need to be released ?
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SMX4-1618, in the description,
Thanks, Sergey
--
Francesco Chicchiriccò
Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
http://www.tirasa.net/
Involved at The Apache Software Foundation:
member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC, CXF committer
http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
