One thing about the implementation. I noticed that microbule is using blueprint for its own setup. I would switch this rather to DS as it has a smaller footprint.
If someone is using microbule with DS then the blueprint overhead is substantial. If someone would use a DS based microbule with blueprint then the DS overhead would be a lot smaller.
Christian On 21.11.2016 19:03, James Carman wrote:
We've been working on a Microservices framework called "Microbule" which leverages CXF and Karaf (hence the cross-post): https://github.com/jwcarman/microbule The idea is to make writing Microservices easy and fun, by providing many of the oft-requested features for you out-of-the-box (CORS, Caching, JSON transformation, validation, etc.). There's a README page that explains how to install/run Microbule in Karaf and how to write your own services. If you're interested, take it for a spin and let us know what you think. Thanks, James
-- Christian Schneider http://www.liquid-reality.de Open Source Architect http://www.talend.com
