+1 to align both, makes way more sense for end users IMHO Le 29 oct. 2017 02:53, "John D. Ament" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Hey guys > > Earlier today I was looking at an issue noted where proxies created for CXF > weren't leveraging JAX-RS Features registered as providers. > > After digging into it further, I noticed that it was likely also true that > they're not supported for WebClient. It seems like the key piece missing > is that all of the support is within ConfigurationImpl, but these two > stacks are using JAXRSClientFactoryBean as the underlying configuration. > > So I'm wondering, what makes more sense? Porting a Configuration object to > be used within the proxy builder, or porting support for features directly > into JAXRSClientFactoryBean. It does seem like there's a strong divide, > ConfigurationImpl classes are using JAX-RS Features, > but JAXRSClientFactoryBean classes are using the CXF native Features. > > John >
