That's not really the issue though. The extension will only receive CDI managed beans. Take a look at my pull to see what I had to do to get it to register automatically. If nothing else, this is an argument for moving JAXRSServer Customization into core and using service loader :-) Perhaps after the new year.
On 2017-12-22 09:23, Sergey Beryozkin <[email protected]> wrote: > I was not referring the OpenTracing module offering a CDI extension, but > to the work Andriy did in the CXF CDI integration where the providers > and feature are picked up. Thought, when we were discussing the SSE > feature I thought Andriy said it was looking at the CXF @Provider as > well, may be I misunderstood. > Updating the CDI code to check CXF @Provider, if it is not already > checked, makes sense IMHO > > Sergey > On 22/12/17 14:08, John D. Ament wrote: > > Actually one more thing. The CDI extension only looks for JAX-RS @Provider > > not CXF @Provider. > > > > On 2017-12-22 09:06, "John D. Ament"<[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm not sure what the CDI extension has to do with this. It has no bean > >> defining annotations, and there is no beans.xml in the JAR that it ships > >> with so I'm not sure it would be picked up by the extension. > >> > >> There's nothing special done for TomcatwarTest to make more JARs > >> available, right? > >> > >> On 2017-12-22 08:15, Sergey Beryozkin <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> It is annotated with CXF @Provider annotation - should be picked up by > >>> the CXF CDI extension > >>> > >>> Sergey > >>> On 22/12/17 13:07, John D. Ament wrote: > >>>> I'm trying to finish up testing CDI injection of Context objects. The > >>>> one > >>>> area I'm struggling with is the automatic registration of this feature. > >>>> I > >>>> added a dependency on OpenTracing, just to confirm that injection via CDI > >>>> works (and to be honest, this is one of my use cases, working with > >>>> tracing). However, it seems that this feature isn't automatically > >>>> registered via CDI. Is there something I have to do to make it work? > >>>> > >>>> John > >>>> > >>> > >> >
