Hi guys, Few random notes/questions:
1. Why not using https://github.com/moditect/moditect/blob/master/README.md and assume the moduleinfo instead of working it around with automatic module name? 2. For the naming it should really be someting like $group.$module IMO, probably with underscores instead of iphens for the module and maybe removing cxf from the module dince it is in the package 3. Is it possible to double relezse each module, one with the module info (if you do 1, or without the automatic module name if you dont) and a qualifier jdk9 and keep current ones as today until the whole stack is java 9 (transitively). Easy to break consumers otherwise. Le 31 déc. 2017 13:38, "Dennis Kieselhorst" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > Exactly, that's the idea, updating the manifest with > Automatic-Module-Name. We could also add a sample > > project (this would be Java 9 based) to illustrate the basic usage of > CXF from/within green field Java 9 > > modular project (although we may need to do more work here I suspect). > Thanks. > I've opened CXF-7600 for it. What should be the Automatic-Module-Name > for cxf-core? Just org.apache.cxf? Or org.apache.cxf.core which doesn't > match the package name structure? > > Regards > Dennis > > >
