Hey guys Cant an option be to use subprojects? Spring integrations sound like good candidate for that and now cxf is modular it should be easier.
Le dim. 13 mai 2018 18:27, Andriy Redko <[email protected]> a écrit : > Hi Dennis, > > In general, I think it would be great to accelerate the work in this > direction and having dedicated > release branch sounds like a good idea. Moreover, JDK 11 will bring even > more challenges for us > regarding the JAXB (and tons of related specs). I have been doing some > work related to that and from > dependencies perspective, it is large but envitable change (since JDK 11 > cuts more stuff). Same goes > for Spring Boot 2.0, the integration would need to be changed. The concern > I have though is that we > would have to support 3.1.x, 3.2.x and 3.3.x (if it is a go) for quite a > while. 3.1.x is still being > used and we are getting requests from time to time to backport some > changes from 3.2.x. 3.2.x has to > stay for older Spring Boot integrations (1.5.x which is still majority) > and Java 8 (who knows for how > long). I would be curious to hear what Dan and other guys think, since > they have seen similar large > changes over the years. But I cerntainly agree we have to think about > that, dedicated branch gives > us more freedom to stabilize things and experiment while 3.2.x serves as a > stable backup. > > Thanks for bringing this up! > > Best Regards, > Andriy Redko > > DK> Hi, > > DK> i'd like to update CXF to Spring/ Spring Security 5 and Spring Boot 2. > There were also discussions about JAXB 2.3.0 > DK> and we might have additional changes for Java 9/10. In my view that > would be a good start for CXF 3.3.x or what do you think? > > DK> Cheers > DK> Dennis > >
