Make sense, thanks Dennis. We figured out that the upgrade to latest 2.0.x was 
also problematic, right? Postponing it to 3.3.x would be better (imho). Colm, 
what do you think? 

Best Regards,
    Andriy Redko

DK> Hi,
DK> we already noticed this in February:
DK> 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e440d7e162f4462972a6116cc523c78b3f1b9128ca23a2fcf9d55167@<dev.cxf.apache.org>

DK> Failing tests are part of the discussion.

DK> I think we should postpone a breaking change until 3.3.x.

DK> Regards
DK> Dennis

Reply via email to