Let’s not add new features in a patch release.  That violates semver.

On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:08 PM Andriy Redko <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Andy,
>
> I would personally prefer to go with official release, getting it out with
> 3.3.1
> would be great I think.
>
> Best Regards,
>     Andriy Redko
>
> AM> I'm working on an initial implementation of MicroProfile Rest Client
> 1.2
> AM> that I'd like to put in the 3.3.X stream.  The spec probably won't be
> AM> finalized until mid-January or later, but there is a 1.2 milestone
> (early
> AM> access) release in Maven central that we could use in a 3.3.0 release.
>
> AM> Does anybody have any thoughts about pushing the Rest Client 1.2
> AM> implementation into the 3.3.0 release (using the early access API) vs
> AM> waiting until January/February to use the official APIs?  I tend to
> prefer
> AM> the former, but I'd be fine either way.
>
> AM> Thanks,
>
> AM> Andy
>
> AM> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 12:08 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <
> [email protected]>
> AM> wrote:
>
> >> Any hope javax.activation and jaxb becomes optional for the 3.3 and
> jaxrs?
> >> I can surely help in 10 days if not too late
>
> >> Le ven. 7 déc. 2018 10:39, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> a
> écrit
> >> :
>
> >> > Hi Colm,
> >> >
> >> > I'm working on a couple of new features for Karaf/OSGi (SCR support +
> >> > simple whiteboard). I will try to submit the PRs soon, but definitely
> >> > not a blocker for the 3.3.0 release.
> >> >
> >> > Regards
> >> > JB
> >> >
> >> > On 07/12/2018 10:27, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
> >> > > Hi all,
> >> > >
> >> > > XML Schema 2.2.4 is under vote, and I believe a vote will also be
> >> called
> >> > on
> >> > > Karaf 4.2.2 shortly. We should be good to go then for CXF 3.3.0
> either
> >> > next
> >> > > week or the week after, so if there is anything anyone needs to get
> in,
> >> > now
> >> > > is the time to do it.
> >> > >
> >> > > Colm.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >> >
>
>
>

Reply via email to