Yes, and we build against JDK12-ea builds, so I think we could ignore it for
now.
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
RMB> Guess the hack on modifiers can be ignored, it is not deterministic anyway
RMB> - it can lead to a noop since java 8. While in unamed modules
RMB> unreflectSpecial will be available which should be enough for cxf for now,
RMB> no?
RMB> Romain Manni-Bucau
RMB> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
RMB> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
RMB> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
<https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
RMB> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
RMB>
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
RMB> Le ven. 21 déc. 2018 à 09:15, Dennis Kieselhorst <[email protected]> a écrit
:
>> Thanks Andriy, looks good for 8-11 now, but 12 is now failing with:
>> Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchFieldException: allowedModes
>> at
>> org.apache.cxf.microprofile.client.CxfTypeSafeClientBuilderTest.testCanInvokeDefaultInterfaceMethods(CxfTypeSafeClientBuilderTest.java:173)
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/CXF/job/CXF-Master-JDK12/lastCompletedBuild/org.apache.cxf$cxf-rt-rs-mp-client/testReport/org.apache.cxf.microprofile.client/CxfTypeSafeClientBuilderTest/testCanInvokeDefaultInterfaceMethods/
>> Regards
>> Dennis
