Yup, if we have to change the spec/api package name, probably CXF 4.x is a better version －－－－－－－－－－－－－ Freeman(Yue) Fang
Red Hat, Inc. > On Aug 8, 2019, at 2:58 PM, Dennis Kieselhorst <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Andy! >> The Jakarta EE 8 release (due in September) is supposed to be binary >> compatible with Java EE 8 - i.e. the javax.* packages will still be javax.* >> (not jakarta.*). Is the plan for 3.4.X to support Jakarta EE 8 (basically >> just swapping the maven coordinates and optionally running the >> now-open-sourced TCK), and then use 3.5.X or later to support Jakarta EE 9 >> with the new package names and new functionality? >> > Your proposal makes sense to me. Maybe it's even time for CXF 4.x.x then... > > Cheers > > Dennis >
