Hi, any news about it? Should I create a JIRA and a PR that removes the IP replacement for localhost?
Best regards, Markus Am Sa., 21. Dez. 2019 um 12:11 Uhr schrieb Markus Rathgeb < [email protected]>: > Hi all and thank you for your replies. > > > That JIRA references the TCK. I don't know off-hand if this translation > of 127.0.0.1 to localhost would case a TCK test to fail if it was reverted. > > Okay, it is one thing to pass all TCK tests successfully. > > But do you not agree that if a code like > > return > Response.created(uriInfo.getBaseUriBuilder().path("foo").path("bar").build()).build(); > > should return a response with status 201 and a location that is using > the same host as in the request? > > Do you consider it is correct to use another location in the response > than in the request? > > What about the cross-origin problems? > > If you agree that a response for the host 127.0.0.1 should be replied > using the host 127.0.0.1, then the test case needs to be fixed. > Doesn't it? > > Best regards, > Markus >
