reta commented on issue #660: URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/660#issuecomment-616724202
@rmannibucau It certainly makes sense (implementation wise the PR needs some work, the ForkJoin pool was also on my list but I thought to have TCK tests first). Yeah, you seem to have more insights into "real" state of MP specs, if there is a better alternative to align with directions the MP is going, I am definitely fine with that (keeping in mind we have to support Java 8). Thanks for the thoughts! ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
