Sure, here it is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8654 :)
Think it is simple enough to not be worth a PR but happy to jump on it if it helps too. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le mar. 8 févr. 2022 à 14:08, Andriy Redko <[email protected]> a écrit : > Hey Romain, > > Sneaked in while we were fixing the JAX-RS TCK tests, certainly should be > optional, > could you please create a JIRA ticket? Thank you. > > Best Regards, > Andriy Redko > > RMB> Hi all, > > RMB> Is there a known regression in 3.5.0 regarding the optional status of > RMB> javax.activation? > > RMB> I'm more particularly pointing org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.utils.JAXRSUtils > which > RMB> requires its presence whereas it should be optional AFAIK so > RMB> InputStreamDataSource shouldn't be hardcoded IMO. > > > RMB> Wdyt? > > RMB> Romain Manni-Bucau > RMB> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > RMB> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > RMB> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > RMB> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > RMB> < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > >
