Hi Jim, I disabled this build (and https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/CXF-JDK19/ as well) because we run pipeline matrix [1] against both JDKs. These builds were quite useful when the main branch was unstable, but the pipeline should be sufficient now. Please let me know if you have any concerns, thank you.
[1] https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/pipeline/job/main/ Best Regards, Andriy Redko JM> Did we already start the 4.0 release work ? JM> I saw the CI build for CXF 4.0.0 is disabled now : JM> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/CXF-JDK17/ and last build result JM> was 7 days ago. JM> On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 8:46 PM Andriy Redko <drr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Colm, >> >> I still wait for review on [1], if you or/and Dan could take a look, >> would be great. The [2] could go in today but no user response on [3], >> may need a bump to next version. Thank you. >> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1033 >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8799 >> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8798 >> >> Best Regards, >> Andriy Redko >> >> COh> Hi Andriy, >> >> COh> What's the status of these open issues? Can they be merged today or >> COh> else bumped to the next release? >> >> COh> Colm. >> >> COh> On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 6:17 PM Andriy Redko <drr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hey guys, >> >> >> >> I have only these 3 issues to wrap up [1], [2], [3], for all of them >> >> pull requests are opened, waiting for minor changes / confirmations >> fixes work. >> >> @Dan @Colm appreciate your input on [4] please, this is to eliminate the >> >> leak of the REMOVED_MARKER. Thanks! >> >> >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8798 >> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8799 >> >> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8796 >> >> [4] https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1033 >> >> >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Andriy Redko >> >> >> >> > I'm done now in terms of any remaining fixes for the next >> >> > releases...not sure if @Andriy Redko has anything else planned? >> >> >> >> > Colm. >> >> >> >> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 10:48 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh >> >> > <cohei...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> >> It works for me as well. I'm coordinating with @Andriy Redko on two >> >> >> fixes that remain for 3.5.x/3.4.x and then we should be good to go. >> >> >> Colm. >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 10:10 AM Jim Ma <mail2ji...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >>> Thanks Andriy and Dan ! >> >> >>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 10:28 PM Andrey Redko <drr...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >>>> Works for me, thanks a lot Dan! >> >> >> >> >>>> Best Regards, >> >> >>>> Andriy Redko >> >> >>>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022, 8:45 AM Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> >>>>>> I don't think anything blocking is left, +1 to move forward! >> @Colm @Dan >> >> >> >> >>>>> do >> >> >>>>>> we want to drop 4.0.0 only or make 3.4.x / 3.5.x releases as >> well? With >> >> >>>>>> 4.0.0 out and 3.6.0 getting ready to be out soon (hopefully), >> the 3.4.x >> >> >>>>> is >> >> >>>>>> approaching EOL quickly, could be the last release. >> >> >>>>> I was definitely planning on doing 3.4/3.5 releases sometime >> before the >> >> >>>>> end of the year. Thus, we could do a full set of releases. I >> have a >> >> >>>>> bunch of things happening this week, but would next Monday work >> for >> >> >>>>> everyone? That would give a week to get any final updates in. >> >> >>>>> Dan >> >> >>>>>> Thank you guys! >> >> >>>>>> Best Regards, >> >> >>>>>> Andriy Redko >> >> >>>>>> On Sun, Nov 27, 2022, 10:27 PM Jim Ma <mail2ji...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >>>>>>> Hi Andriy, >> >> >>>>>>> Can we start the release work if there isn't the major thing >> left we >> >> >>>>> need >> >> >>>>>>> to include in CXF 4.0.0 release ? >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> @Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> Can you please help do the >> release >> >> >>>> when >> >> >>>>>>> it's convenient for you? >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Thanks, >> >> >>>>>>> Jim >> >> >>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 1:18 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >> j...@nanthrax.net >> >> >>>>>>> wrote: >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> +1 to release 4.0.0 even partial release. >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Regards >> >> >>>>>>>> JB >> >> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 9:19 AM Jim Ma <mail2ji...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >>>>>>>>> Hi all, >> >> >>>>>>>>> After 9 months of work, we finally fixed/worked around all >> issues >> >> >>>> for >> >> >>>>>>>>> Jakarta support. Now all the cxf tests are passed: >> >> >>>>>>>>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/CXF-JDK17/848/ and >> we can >> >> >>>>> say >> >> >>>>>>>> that >> >> >>>>>>>>> CXF successfully migrated to Jakarta namespace(and support >> Jakarta >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> EE9.1). >> >> >>>>>>>>> To get cxf jakarta artifacts/binary available for the CXF >> community >> >> >>>>>>>>> especially the user who asked for this jakarta artifacts like >> [1] >> >> >>>> and >> >> >>>>>>>> get >> >> >>>>>>>>> more feedback from our community, do you think it's time to >> release >> >> >>>>> the >> >> >>>>>>>> CXF >> >> >>>>>>>>> 4.0.0 and what else do you think we should have in this new >> jakarta >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> release >> >> >>>>>>>>> ? >> >> >>>>>>>>> [1] >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/kwfg2s5gj72tkgn5c5vdcsvtgdkdm6dl >> >> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >> >> >>>>>>>>> Jim >> >> >>>>> -- >> >> >>>>> Daniel Kulp >> >> >>>>> dk...@apache.org <mailto:dk...@apache.org> >> >> >>>>> Talend - https://talend.com <https://talend.com/> >> >> >> >>
