reta commented on code in PR #1784:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1784#discussion_r1550523564
##########
rt/rs/extensions/search/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/jaxrs/ext/search/Beanspector.java:
##########
@@ -58,49 +58,62 @@ public Beanspector(T tobj) {
init();
}
- @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
- private void init() {
- if (tclass == null) {
- tclass = (Class<T>)tobj.getClass();
- }
- for (Method m : tclass.getMethods()) {
- if (isGetter(m)) {
- String pname = getPropertyName(m);
- if (!getters.containsKey(pname)) {
- getters.put(getPropertyName(m), m);
- } else {
- // Prefer the getter that has the most specialized class
as a return type
- Method met = getters.get(pname);
- if
(met.getReturnType().isAssignableFrom(m.getReturnType())) {
- getters.put(pname, m);
- }
- }
- } else if (isSetter(m)) {
- String pname = getPropertyName(m);
- if (!setters.containsKey(pname)) {
- setters.put(getPropertyName(m), m);
- } else {
- // Prefer the setter that has the most specialized class
as a parameter
- Method met = setters.get(pname);
- if
(met.getParameterTypes()[0].isAssignableFrom(m.getParameterTypes()[0])) {
- setters.put(pname, m);
- }
- }
- }
- }
- // check type equality for getter-setter pairs
- Set<String> pairs = new HashSet<>(getters.keySet());
- pairs.retainAll(setters.keySet());
- for (String accessor : pairs) {
- Class<?> getterClass = getters.get(accessor).getReturnType();
- Class<?> setterClass =
setters.get(accessor).getParameterTypes()[0];
- if (!setterClass.isAssignableFrom(getterClass)) {
- throw new IllegalArgumentException(String
- .format("Accessor '%s' type mismatch, getter type is
%s while setter type is %s",
- accessor, getterClass.getName(),
setterClass.getName()));
- }
- }
- }
+ @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
+ private void init() {
+ if (tclass == null) {
+ tclass = (Class<T>)tobj.getClass();
+ }
+
+ //Class.getMethods does not provide an ordering.
Review Comment:
@jgoodyear I believe the dependency on ordering is an issue that we should
fix, it is should not be JDK dependent (neither version or vendor), could we
make the implementation resilient to any ordering dependencies? Thank you.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
