Huge +1 from my side.

We would be more than happy to start integrating a 4.1.0-SNAPSHOT in TomEE, so 
we get back to speed regarding EE10 efforts :)

Thanks Andriy!

Gruß
Richard

On 2024/04/11 12:08:19 Freeman Fang wrote:
> +1 to move main branch to CXF 4.1.x, thanks Andriy!
> 
> Freeman
> 
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 7:48 AM Andriy Redko <drr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hey Folks,
> >
> > I would like to resume the discussion regarding 4.1.x (Jakarta EE 10): the
> > Jakarta EE 9.x was a transitional release, most (if not all) already
> > jumped off.
> > From the CXF side, quite a lot of work has been done already on 4.1.x
> > (Jakarta EE 10),
> > streamlining it would definitely help. So far only @Francesco responded
> > (thanks a lot)
> > but would be great to hear from others. Thanks!
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >     Andriy Redko
> >
> > > +1 thanks Andriy
> >
> > > Regards.
> >
> > > On 09/07/23 20:29, Andriy Redko wrote:
> > >> Hey Folks,
> >   >>> The work on Jakarta EE 10 had started already (so far the progress
> > was a bit slower
> > >> than desired but the things should accelerate I hope). It becomes
> > increasingly difficult
> > >> to keep the separate pull request [1] intact (particularly, dependabot
> > is constantly trying
> > >> to update to latest specs). To ease the implementation efforts, I would
> > like to propose
> > >> to:
> > >>   - branch of 4.0.x-fixes from main
> > >>   - move main to 4.1.x
> > >>   - work on [1] to be ready for merge with main
> > >>  From the maintenance perspective, that would increase a bit the amount
> > of work required:
> > >>   - 3.5.x and 3.6.x: those are the last (hopefully) branches for
> > javax.* to maintain
> > >>   - 4.0.x and 4.1.x (upcoming): those are the ones to support going
> > forward for jakarta.* to maintain
> > >> Any feedback / thoughts / suggestions are very welcome!
> > >> Thanks!
> > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8671
> > >> [2] https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1201
> > >> Best Regards,
> > >>      Andriy Redko
> >
> >
> 

Reply via email to