You can also develop additional matchers if you want. So you can specify the WS-Policy Specification notice as a license so you don't have to exclude files that contain those.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 2:22 PM Claude Warren <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes. > > I see that there are URLs associated with the W3C® Software License in > several of the files that are listed in the rat.unknowns.txt file. > http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-software-20021231 > > We now detect that as a W3C license. We also accept the SPDX tag. > > It might be interesting to see how many of the files are now detected. > > Claude > > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 1:32 PM Andriy Redko <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hey Claude! >> >> Nice to hear from you! I don't recall any issues with rat plugin for at >> least last couple of years but probably because of exclusions [1], is it >> what you are looking for? >> Thanks again! >> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/main/etc%2Frat.unknowns.txt >> >> Best Regards, >> Andriy Redko >> >> On Fri, Oct 24, 2025, 4:02 a.m. Claude Warren <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Greetings, >>> >>> We have a very old ticket on the RAT backlog that indicates that CXF has >>> problems with RAT and WS-* licenses. Is this still a problem? If so can >>> someone point me to a file that has the problem. >>> >>> The entire ticket says: CXF has lots of tricky WS-* licenses. Add >>> recognition code. >>> >>> Any assistance would be appreciated. >>> >>> Claude >>> >>> -- >>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren >>> >> > > -- > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren > -- LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
