[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16352640#comment-16352640
 ] 

Michael Beckerle commented on DAFFODIL-1884:
--------------------------------------------

It appears that priorBitOrder, which was put into parsing, to address bitorder 
changing issues, was never implemented in unparsing.

There's also a fragmentBitOrder var and setter in data output streams which 
seems like duplicate mechanism to priorBitOrder which is in data stream common 
state so part of both parsing and unparsing. 

fragment bit order should go away, and priorBitOrder used where appropriate in 
unparser code instead of finfo.bitOrder being used everywhere.



> Regression in bitOrder changing
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DAFFODIL-1884
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1884
>             Project: Daffodil
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Steve Lawrence
>            Assignee: Michael Beckerle
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.1.0
>
>
> test_bitOrderOVC1 inĀ 
> ./daffodil-test/src/test/scala-new/edu/illinois/ncsa/daffodil/section00/general/TestUnparserGeneral2.scala
>  currently fails. It appears to be a regression with recent changes to how 
> bitOrder works, but was not discovered because the test is in scala-new. This 
> test should be fixed and moved into the scala directory since the scala-new 
> directory is no longer used and ignored.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to